alexthegreater ([info]alexthegreater) wrote,
@ 2007-07-02 22:54:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Yesterday or so I finished reading The Name of the Rose. It's a very interesting novel, you see, it's a murder-mystery set in a 14th century Italian monastery. A visiting British monk, who combines the qualities of William of Occam and Sherlock Holmes, sets about trying to discover who is committing the murders. Meanwhile, a council is meeting at the monastery to discuss whether or not Jesus owned the rags that he wore. Now, this sounds completely pointless, but if Jesus did own his rags, then it means that the church can legitimately own property, and then this has ramifications on the geopolitical balance between France and the Holy Roman Empire. This, of course, gets tied into the murders. It's all really quite fascinating. The author, Umberto Eco, was a medieval historian who specialized in studying manuscripts and monasteries, so the book does a really excellent job displaying the monastic way of life as well as giving the reader a view into the medieval mindset. Nifty stuff. They made a movie of it a few years back starring Sean Connery and Christian Slater. It's...not as good as the book.



(6 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]cthulhu_shuman
2007-07-03 11:38 am UTC (link)
I've always wanted to read that book.

Have you read "Morality Play"? Similar time period, also a murder mystery, way awesome. It's also a movie, except this one stars Wilhelm DeFoe, and is really good.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]alexthegreater
2007-07-05 09:04 pm UTC (link)
Haven't heard of that one before, but I might take a look into it. You really should read Name of the Rose. It is pretty lengthy (600 pages), but it's worth it.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]asurapuji
2007-07-04 01:06 pm UTC (link)
hmmm... i may have to check that out. sounds interesting. also, anything with both sean connery and christian slater fails to be quite as awesome as it should be, e.g. Robin Hood. granted, it wasn't necessarily either connery or slater who brought down that movie. however, they were in it and alan rickman's presence and the general concept for the film should have made it much, much better.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]alexthegreater
2007-07-05 09:14 pm UTC (link)
Despite all logic, I have fond memories of that movie, possibly due to brain damage. I should never have drank all that lead paint, but man, it was tasty.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]livetta
2007-07-05 05:50 pm UTC (link)
Not as good as the book BY A LONG SHOT. :)

Umberto Eco is an amazing writer, and friends of mine also highly recommend The Island of the Day Before, which is another book that showcases Eco's amazing skill as an author. It's next on my to-read list, after I finish the Bradbury and LeGuin in which I'm nose-deep. :D

Also, I send lickings.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]alexthegreater
2007-07-05 09:40 pm UTC (link)
Apparently the internet did a poor job transferring the dry understatement of my last sentence. Still, even if the movie is terrible compared to the book, I still find it entertaining. I might read Foucault's Pendulum next, as the premise (crazy conspiracy theories) sounds fun.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(6 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…